Plea Bargaining in Nigeria’s Anti-Corruption Framework: A Shield for The Rich?
By Benneth, Chukwuebuka Promise, Esq.
INTRODUCTION:
Plea bargaining, as a legal tool, is increasingly employed by anti-corruption agencies in Nigeria to expedite the resolution of high-profile cases. While its theoretical benefits include efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and reduced caseloads, its practical application has drawn criticism for perpetuating selective justice and eroding public trust. This article interrogates the constitutional and statutory basis of plea bargaining in Nigeria, examines its controversial use by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), and assesses whether it promotes justice or shields the elite from full accountability.
Corruption remains one of the most significant challenges to good governance and development in Nigeria. Over the years, various legal and institutional frameworks—such as the EFCC Act, ICPC Act, and the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015—have been established to tackle the menace. Among the tools adopted is plea bargaining, a process that allows a defendant to plead guilty in exchange for a lighter sentence or the return of stolen assets.
LEGAL BASIS AND EVOLUTION OF PLEA BARGAINING IN NIGERIA:
Plea bargaining was formally introduced into Nigeria’s criminal justice system through Section 270 of the ACJA 2015, which codifies the process and provides judicial oversight. Prior to this, it was applied through prosecutorial discretion, particularly by the EFCC. Despite its procedural legitimacy, it remains controversial due to perceived abuse and its moral implications in corruption cases.
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF PLEA BARGAINING:
– Efficiency: It reduces the time and resources needed for full trials, especially in complex financial crimes.
– Asset Recovery: Facilitates the swift return of public funds.
– Judicial Economy: Eases court congestion and allows judges to focus on more contentious cases.
– Certainty of Outcome: Prosecutors avoid the risk of acquittal due to weak evidence or technicalities.
CONTROVERSIES AND CRITICISMS:
– Perceived Elitism: High-profile individuals often receive lenient sentences after plea deals, whereas ordinary citizens face the full force of the law.
– Moral Hazard: It may inadvertently encourage looting with the expectation of reduced penalties upon discovery.
– Lack of Transparency: Many plea agreements are not fully disclosed, raising questions about fairness and judicial propriety.
– Undermining Deterrence: Critics argue that it sends the wrong message that corruption is negotiable.
CASE EXAMPLES:
– Tafa Balogun (former IGP): Convicted in a plea deal and sentenced to 6 months despite charges involving over #13 billion.
– Lucky Igbinedion (former Edo State Governor): Entered a plea bargain and paid fines, yet no substantive prison term was served.
COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE:
In jurisdictions such as the United States, plea bargaining is regulated but still controversial. However, transparency, public accountability, and prosecutorial guidelines help mitigate abuse. Nigeria lacks such robust institutional safeguards, exacerbating public mistrust.
WAY FORWARD AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
– Institutional Guidelines: The National Judicial Council and Ministry of Justice should establish standardized criteria for plea bargains in corruption cases.
– Judicial Oversight: Courts must scrutinize plea deals to ensure they serve justice, not expedience.
– Public Disclosure: Full details of plea bargains, including recovered assets and sentencing, should be published.
– Differential Application: Minor offenders may benefit more from plea deals; serious economic crimes should be prosecuted fully to deter impunity.
CONCLUSION:
While plea bargaining is a legitimate legal tool, its application in Nigeria’s anti-corruption regime often appears to privilege the politically connected. For it to serve as a vehicle for justice rather than a shield for the rich, reforms must ensure that the process is transparent, consistent, and equitable. In the absence of such safeguards, the public perception of selective justice may continue to undermine the credibility of Nigeria’s legal system.
REFERENCES:
1. Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015, s 270.
2. EFCC v Tafa Balogun [2005] FHC/ABJ/CR/14/2005 (unreported).
3. Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended), s 6, 36.
4. Lucky Igbinedion v Federal Republic of Nigeria [2008] 7 NWLR (Pt 1085) 92.
5. Kehinde Aina, ‘Plea Bargaining and the Nigerian Legal System: Problems and Prospects’ (2012) 3(1) Nigerian Journal of Law and Practice 21.
****************************************************************************************
This work is published under the free legal awareness project of Sabi Law Foundation (www.SabiLaw.org) funded by the law firm of Bezaleel Chambers International (www.BezaleelChambers.com). The writer was not paid or charged any publishing fee. You too can support the legal awareness projects and programs of Sabi Law Foundation by donating to us. Donate here and get our unique appreciation certificate or memento.
DISCLAIMER:
This publication is not a piece of legal advice. The opinion expressed in this publication is that of the author(s) and not necessarily the opinion of our organisation, staff and partners.
PROJECTS:
🛒 Take short courses, get samples/precedents and learn your rights at www.SabiLaw.org
🎯 Publish your legal articles for FREE by sending to: eve@sabilaw.org
🎁 Receive our free Daily Law Tips & other publications via our website and social media accounts or join our free whatsapp group: Daily Law Tips Group 5
KEEP IN TOUCH:
Get updates on all the free legal awareness projects of Sabi Law (#SabiLaw) and its partners, via:
YouTube: SabiLaw
Twitter: @Sabi_Law
Facebook page: SabiLaw
Instagram: @SabiLaw.org_
WhatsApp Group: Free Daily Law Tips Group 5
Telegram Group: Free Daily Law Tips Group
Facebook group: SabiLaw
Email: lisa@sabilaw.org
Website: www.SabiLaw.org
ABOUT US & OUR PARTNERS:
This publication is the initiative of the Sabi Law Foundation (www.SabiLaw.org) funded by the law firm of Bezaleel Chambers International (www.BezaleelChambers.com). Sabi Law Foundation is a Not-For-Profit and Non-Governmental Legal Awareness Organization based in Nigeria. It is the first of its kind and has been promoting free legal awareness since 2010.
DONATION & SPONSORSHIP:
As a registered not-for-profit and non-governmental organisation, Sabi Law Foundation relies on donations and sponsorships to promote free legal awareness across Nigeria and the world. With a vast followership across the globe, your donations will assist us to increase legal awareness, improve access to justice, reduce common legal disputes and crimes in Nigeria. Make your donations to us here or contact us for sponsorship and partnership, via: lisa@SabiLaw.org or +234 903 913 1200.
**********************************************************************************
